AMD Marketing claims that Radeon RX 6000 GPUs offer better performance per dollar and higher frames per watt versus NVIDIA’s RTX 30 series.

In a new marketing slide published by AMD, the company claims that its Radeon RX 6000 GPUs are ahead in both pricing and efficiency versus NVIDIA’s RTX 30 series.

AMD Radeon RX 6000 GPUs offer better value and efficiency than NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 30-series, Red team claims

The slide in question was chirp By AMD Chief Gaming Engineer Frank Azure, which showcases both performance per watt and performance per dollar for AMD’s entire Radeon RX 6000 range versus the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30 series. The list of GPUs includes all the way from the fastest AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT to Radeon RX 6400 for beginners.

AMD Flagship RDNA 3 Navi 31 GPU Allegedly named ‘Plum Bonito’ and uses ‘Gemini’ board, next generation RDNA 4 may arrive in ‘GFX1200’ series

AMD used street card prices for comparison, not MSRPs. Based on benchmarks, the AMD Radeon RX 6000 series offers:

• RX6950XTvs. RTX3090: 80% High FPS/$ ($1,100 vs. $1,700)
• RX6900XTvs. RTX 3080Ti: 19% higher FPS/$ ($1,000 vs. $1,170)
• RX6800XTvs. RTX3080: 6% higher FPS/$ ($850 vs $850)
• RX6800 vs. RTX 3070 Ti: 8% higher FPS/$ ($759/$750)
• RX6750XTvs. RTX3070: 33% higher FPS/$ ($550 vs $700)
• RX6700XTvs. RTX 3060Ti: 30% higher FPS/$ ($490 vs. $580)
• RX6650XTvs. RTX3060: 54% higher FPS/$ ($400 vs. $430)
• RX6600 vs. RTX3050: 40% higher FPS/$ ($330 vs. $330)
• Comparison between RX 6500 XT and GTX 1650: 19% higher FPS/$(199 vs. $190)
• RX6400 vs. GTX 1050Ti: 89% higher FPS/$ ($160 vs. $192)

AMD claimed up to 89% better performance per watt when comparing the new RDNA 2 Radeon RX 6400 graphics card to a multi-year-old GTX 1050 Ti graphics card. The second biggest increase comes from the recently released flagship, the RX 6950 XT which offers an 80% increase over its RTX competitor, the GeForce RTX 3090, with an 80% higher value. However, AMD has also shared performance-per-watt metrics for the Radeon RX 6000 series range which can be seen below:

• RX6950XTvs. RTX3090: 22% higher FPS/watt (335 watts vs 350 watts)
• RX6900XTvs. RTX 3080Ti: 19% higher FPS/watt (300 watts vs 350 watts)
• RX6800XTvs. RTX3080: 21% higher FPS/watt (280 watts vs 320 watts)
• RX6800 vs. RTX 3070Ti: 27% higher FPS/watt (250 watts vs 290 watts)
• RX6750XTvs. RTX3070: Similar FPS / Watt (250 Watts vs. 220 Watts)
• RX6700XTvs. RTX 3060Ti: 10% higher FPS/watt (230 watts vs 200 watts)
• RX6650XTvs. RTX3060: 35% higher FPS/watt (180 watts vs. 170 watts)
• RX6600 vs. RTX3050: 38% higher FPS/watt (132 watts vs 130 watts)
• Comparison between RX 6500 XT and GTX 1650: Similar FPS/Watt (107 Watts vs. 75 Watts)
• RX6400 vs. GTX 1050Ti: 123% higher FPS/watt (53W vs. 75W)

AMD also lists each specific gaming category that is dedicated to these cards. Navi 24 offerings such as the Radeon RX 6500 XT and RX 6400 are intended for mid-range 1080p gaming, Navi 23 offerings are designed for 1080p Max, Navi 22 offerings that include the RX 6700 series are designed for 2K Max while the Navi 21 offerings are intended for 4K maxed out for this segment. .

Once again, prices are the lowest as seen in Newegg on May 10, 2022. With constantly changing prices, this graph may soon become invalid but it seems that AMD and NVIDIA are aware of the fact that with lower prices and improved availability, players will now be looking for a new solution. for their PCs and both companies are doing their best through marketing and promotions to entice gamers to buy current generation graphics cards. AMD and NVIDIA have already done marketing about the availability of these cards The Red Team also recently announced its full relaunch Game Lift package.

AMD Radeon RX 6000 Series “RDNA 2” graphics cards:

photographer card	AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT	AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT	AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT	AMD Radeon RX 6800	AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT	AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT	AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT	AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT	AMD Radeon RX 6600	AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT	AMD Radeon RX 6400
GPU	Navi 21 KXTX	Navi 21 XTX	Navi 21 XT	Navi 21 XL	Navi 22 KXT	Navi 22 XT	Navi 23 KXT	Navi 23 (XT)	Navi 23 (XL)	Navi 24 (XT)	Navi 24 (XL)
operation knot	7nm	7nm	7nm	7nm	7nm	7nm	7nm	7nm	7nm	6nm	6nm
die size	520mm2	520mm2	520mm2	520mm2	336mm2	336mm2	237mm2	237mm2	237mm2	107mm2	107mm2
transistor	26.8 billion	26.8 billion	26.8 billion	26.8 billion	17.2 billion	17.2 billion	11.06 billion	11.06 billion	11.06 billion	5.4 billion	5.4 billion
Arithmetic units	80	80	72	60	40	40	32	32	28	16	12
stream processors	5120	5120	4608	3840	2560	2560	2048	2048	1792	1024	768
TMUs / Royal Oman Police	320/128	320/128	288/128	240/96	160/64	160/64	128/64	128/64	112/64	64/32	48/32
clock game	2116MHz	2015MHz	2015MHz	1815MHz	2495MHz	2424MHz	2410MHz	2359MHz	2044MHz	2610MHz	2039MHz
increase the clock	2324MHz	2250MHz	2250MHz	2105MHz	2600MHz	2581MHz	2635MHz	2589MHz	2491MHz	2815MHz	2321MHz
FP32 TFLOPs	23.80 TFLOPs	23.04 TFLOPs	20.74 TFLOPs	16.17 TFLOPs	13.31 TFLOPs	13.21 TFLOPs	10.79 TFLOPs	10.6 TFLOPs	9.0 TFLOPs	5.7 TFLOPs	3.5 TFLOPs
memory size	16GB GDDR6 + 128MB Infinity Cache	16GB GDDR6 + 128MB Infinity Cache	16GB GDDR6 + 128MB Infinity Cache	16GB GDDR6 + 128MB Infinity Cache	12GB GDDR6 + 96MB Infinity Cache	12GB GDDR6 + 96MB Infinity Cache	8GB GDDR6 + 32MB Infinity Cache	8GB GDDR6 + 32MB Infinity Cache	8GB GDDR6 + 32MB Infinity Cache	4GB GDDR6 + 16MB Infinity Cache	4GB GDDR6 + 16MB Infinity Cache
memory-bus	256 bit	256 bit	256 bit	256 bit	192 bit	192 bit	128 bit	128 bit	128 bit	64 bit	64 bit
memory-clock	18Gbps	16Gbps	16Gbps	16Gbps	18Gbps	16Gbps	17.5Gbps	16Gbps	14Gbps	18Gbps	14Gbps
bandwidth	576GB/sec	512GB/sec	512GB/sec	512GB/sec	432GB/sec	384GB/sec	280GB/sec	256GB/sec	224GB/sec	144GB/sec	112GB/sec
TDP	335W	300 watts	300 watts	250 watts	250 watts	230 watts	176W	160 watts	132W	107 watts	53 watts
price	$1,099	$999	$649	$579	$549	$479	$399	$379	$329	$199	159 US dollars?

news source: Video Cards